Monday, June 11, 2012

"breaking" a submissive . . .

I've seen a number of posts recently on the topic of "breaking" a submissive, a subject on which I have many of my own thoughts to share.  However, before inflicting my opinions upon you, my dear reader, I'd like to begin by quoting another dominant I've grown to respect greatly.

Here is Omega's opening comment from the Power Exchange where he penned a post called Breaking the Girl.  It's as good an introduction to this topic as any I've seen:
It conjurs the image of a wild horse, the animal being roped. She struggles, fighting wildly against it. Eventually calming, only to have a rider on her back. The sensation, odd at first she bucks fiercely trying to knock the rider off. After several times, she calms, relaxing into it, accepting the rider. Eventually it sinks in, she intrinsically understands it is hopeless to effect a change.
She becomes dependent on her owner, who feeds her, washes her down after a ride and she remains fiercely loyal to her owner. The horse is broken, but has gained a greater purpose in service to her owner.
It is important to keep reminding one self; women are not horses.
As was once said in a hit song, "I second that emotion."  Let me reiterate, "It is important to keep reminding one self; women are not horses."  I'm a dominant who's also a bit of a sexual sadist, but I don't believe in tearing people down to build them up, and I don't believe in breaking submissives.  If that's your kink or your style, there's not a lot we can expect to have in common.

As Omega said, "The topic of breaking another conjures such great visceral responses."  I just want to make it clear that I am myself reacting viscerally, for a number of reasons.  If ya don't like what I'm saying, you are welcome to look elsewhere for your reading material, as this is one topic where I will not negotiate or debate.

Back in December I wrote a post that touched on this subject, where I said:
I have to admit watching a proud woman who is my equal kiss my boots is a far greater charge of excitement for me than were it done by a woman who was kissing them not out of honor, respect and devotion, but instead was slavishly attending my boots because she felt inferior.
Meh, sorry, being served by the downtrodden is no charge at all.  Nobody can give me proper respect if they have none for themselves.  I can't have any fun reducing someone to writhing like an animal, begging for pleasure, and then begging for the same pleasure to stop, if they are already surviving like an animal.
If a slave is somebody who has been totally devalued, I'd not want to command them, I'd want to shelter and protect them until they felt valued and human.  My style of domination isn't depersonalizing, in fact quite the opposite, it's expressed by continually pushing for growth, empowerment, and enlightenment within the rituals and devotions of submission.
I guess that's as good and succinct a comment as any I'd pen today on the topic.  So, with that in mind, I won't try to reiterate the points again, instead I'll attempt to illustrate with short story from my life.  It is very recent, and it's very raw in my psyche, because it involves an individual I've come to care about deeply, despite never having met in person.

Yesterday, Serafina and I were messaged by a dear friend who's been experiencing ups and downs in a long distance relationship with a dominant.  Our friend was devastated, she'd been crying, and she really needed a friendly shoulder.  I'd planned to hitch Serafina up to our new dungeon bed last night for a figging and a flogging, but plans for fun don't trump the real life needs of an individual we care about.  Meaning that instead my slave/wife spent two hours on the phone consoling our friend, who believes her relationship with her dom guy is over.

Our friend was destroyed by what had happened with her love, you might even say that for a moment, she felt broken by the turmoil, angst, and separation.  I'm not trying to say she was "broken" in the sense used in posts like "Breaking the Girl", where the discussion is more about dominants and submissives who fantasize and romanticize the act of breaking a submissive, instead I'm trying to make a correlated point.

My point is simply that there is no honor in "Breaking the Girl".  It's no accomplishment.  It's nothing to be proud of doing.  It's not even that hard to do, to break someone once you've asked them to put real faith in you.  It might be said that a submissive trusts a dominant in much the same manner as a child initially trusts a parent, in that the trust makes them very open and vulnerable.

It's not difficult to hurt a vulnerable person, it's not hard to break a vulnerable person.  Obviously, something that's not difficult to achieve is no real achievement, if you can understand that kind of logic.

Our friend was hurt simply because she was vulnerable, she was open.  She loved her dominant as a submissive lady should, he didn't return or repay her in kind.  In the end, it seems from my perspective, that he acted like a coward, becoming distant, rather than admitting that his compartmentalized life was designed for short illusive relationships.  She could never belong to him as long as he belonged to his wife . . .

Returning to my more personal commentary rather than a story about a friend. I have to add that a psychiatrist friend of mine calls me a "Master of the Obvious", as I often speak about things others have in front of their faces, but fail or refuse to note for themselves.  My writing, however, tends to be a little more obtuse, so I want to make sure today's message is crystal clear . . .

I can completely understand a person wanting to be "broken" in a very specific manner, as a part of a cathartic release, as a personal challenge, as part of a shamanic type ritual, or perhaps a few other scenarios involving a quest for personal growth or fulfillment.

Such activities must be approached with respect, and must have carefully planned preparations, a limited duration for their fulfillment, not to mention help with recovery from the ordeal.

That's different from breaking a horse, and it's different from truly breaking a submissive.

To "break" a girl as a regular planned part of bringing about their submission, to break them in the sense of creating a quivering creature that is kept in her place with dependence and fear, to make her obedient like a trained animal, isn't exactly a recipe for a better slave.  It's quite the opposite in fact.

In the end, it just seems like a recipe for creating post traumatic stress disorder.


POST SOUNDTRACK - I Second That Emotion by Smokey Robinson and The Miracles

8 comments:

  1. Thank you for sharing your comments on "breaking". I've read the blogs you mentioned and had a difficult time understanding the entire concept. (not in that type relationship)Apparently it more than just semantics differences. What you say makes much more sense and would to lead to a deeper more fulfilling relationship.

    Besides, the responsibility of a Dom for undertaking a submissive's care seems overwhelming enough without the added pressure of 'breaking' as described in your next to last paragraph.

    Joyce

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Joyce for gracing us with your comments. . you are absolutely correct!

      Delete
  2. I've been broken in the bad way, in much the same situation. He had my absolute devotion, but couldn't process, accept, and love me the same way, and just gradually distanced me until I was broken. I've never felt so sad in my life - not after a death, not when I couldn't get pregnant. It was horrible.

    But the other kind, the kind where your body quivers and it's a point you've reached through much work and preparation? It's fantastic.

    Also: kudos to you guys for being decent people and helping a friend out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess there's no avoiding the fact that because D/s relationships can be so very intense, the emotional pain they can inflict when someone withdraws is so very extreme.

      Thanks for the kudos, we normally give of ourselves pretty freely, it's pretty inescapable for folks who's nature is to nurture.

      Delete
  3. Michael Sir,

    This is hard topic for mouse to comment on, because she's been broken in a bad way. Strong walls were forged, and eventually Daddy was able to break through them. He broke through the barriers. Honestly, mouse doesn't know what to think when she reads about this topic, instead she looks to Daddy to guide her thoughts.

    Love,
    mouse

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear M Mouse! It is correct to defer to your Master. I love how you do try to honor him.

      Delete
  4. I think one of the big areas of confusion related to this is that when a submissive "wants to be broken", that's not really what they're looking for. They are looking for "stretching room", they want to be able to struggle and fight back, while remaining secure in the knowledge that their dominant partner can handle it. Often during a session like this, the submissive will "break" - but they're not actually breaking, they're finding emotional release. That release is being able to expose yourself at your most vulnerable to someone, a deeply intimate connection.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am a new dominant with a very loyal devoted sub. She wants me to break her to abolish a deep seeded defiance in her. Is this a test?

    ReplyDelete